767. Day Five of the Republican-created so-called Shutdown
Day
Five of the Republican-planned so-called shutdown and a little has
changed. In order to understand this post, you have to had previously
read my post of October 2nd which begins "So the second day . . . " The
gist of that entry is two fold - 1) this isn't a shutdown but a
selective slowdown, and 2) unless everyone participates, it really
doesn't matter.
Yes, I have friends suffering the financial
effects of the shutdown and if I were in their shoes, it'd only take a
few paychecks and I'd be in trouble but for some friends and family who
might help me one way or another. And those same families may already
be like me helping out their own family and friends who are already out
of work. I've read today that the House has voted unanimously to pay
them. Well, that's good and they need it but it defeats the purpose.
It honestly isn't good economics but it is good PR and that is something
in short supply in the Federal City. Similarly, there's a bill to open
some of the National Parks as if this makes a dint in the
$17,000,000,000,000.00 debt. It won't and it is silly. It will allow
some Republican members of Congress the opportunity to beat their chests
showing their approval while going unanswered will be the systematic
cuts those same members have been making to veterans for years. Again,
it is really for show. While I am on that topic, I'm trying to imagine
some company owner who decides for whatever reason to take a two-week
vacation, furloughing their employees, and closing all of their
facilities. Imagine their reaction if some overzealous politicians
showed up at their plant, rushed the gates, and opened the doors for all
the world to see since they made sure a camera was close-by recording
their heroic efforts. How would the owner feel? Just a thought. The
counter-argument is the parks are public property and I have a place in
my property rights-oriented heart for that idea. Still, someone has to
clean up after the invasion, emptying the trash, and paying the water,
light, and gas bills which were supposed to be at a minimum during the
shutdown. But, I digress.
The previous diatribe mostly asked the
question "how does the Republican-created so-called shutdown do anything
about the $17,000,000,000,000.00 debt?" No one answered that one.
Since that time, I've ventured further into the idea that no one on the
Republican side of the aisle has answered because they have no answer.
Their intention has little to do with Obamacare or the debt or even the
deficit, although some of their followers may not realize this or may
not acknowledge they are being used. It is all really about a handful
of Tea Partiers threatening their caucus and its leader, Speaker
Boehner, with primaries in the 2014 cycle, such as the Kentucky kind
which elected Senator Rand Paul to office in 2010 and Congressman Tom
Massie in 2012. Moderate and even conservatives Republicans are
demonstrably concerned about losing their asses in 2014. Wait, I mean
losing the congressional seats. Sorry. Or, is that the reason?
Maybe
it is simply a desire on the part of the Republican Party to close down
the government. I came across an article in the Republican-leaning
website Politico from September 10, 2010, a little over three years ago.
In the article Congressman Lynn Westmoreland, R-GA3 (SW Atlanta
suburbs southwest to Columbus) predicts the current shutdown as part of
plan should the Republicans regain the House, as they did in the 2010
elections. The other part of the plan was the recall of Obamacare,
something they tried and failed at 42 times (so far). I don't often
cite to certain sources in my research, concerned about their political
bias. In this case, the site's bias is to the Republicans so I feel a
little more at ease in using it. And I feel a little better in calling
the so-called shutdown solely a creation of the Republican Party, and
not just a creation but part of a plan according to one of its own
members.
Here is a link to the story: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0910/41980.html
No comments:
Post a Comment