Showing posts with label Washington DC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Washington DC. Show all posts

Sunday, February 21, 2021

827. Wynken, Blynken, and Nod - no, Lauren, Junior, Ted, and Andrew

Last week was a series of misfires for at least four American politicians. Congresswoman Lauren Boebert, R-CO3, and a strong supporter of the Second Amendment, featured herself posing in front of a small arsenal of guns, was quoted saying we weren't "meant to rewrite parts of the Constitution" somehow forgetting the Second Amendment is, in fact, an amendment - a rewrite.
Then there's Donald Trump, Jr., who, while trying to defend one Texas politician during the Texas ice storm and energy debacle, misidentified another, implying the governor of Texas, Greg Abbot, is a Democrat. Rest assured, Junior, he isn't and we wouldn't have the incompetent fool on our side. Maybe Junior needs to study up on his list of governors. Presently among America's governors, among the states 23 are Democrats and 27 are Republicans. Among the territories, three are Democrats and one is a Republican. The Puerto Rican governor's party, while not a part of the Democratic Party, is affiliated with it.
The Texas politician Junior was trying to defend was the Canadian Cuban Senator Rafael "Ted" Cruz, who can now add Cancun to the list of descriptors ahead of his name. While Texas was frozen due to the ineptitude of its political system with regard to energy regulation, frozen to the point of people dying, Ted and his family decided to skip town and cross the border (and then some) for some "fiesta y siesta" in sunny Cancun, Mexico. The escapade was quickly brought to the attention of most of America and, with the exception of diehard Trumpers, frowned upon. Cruz has changed the details of his trip twice but is making up for it with a lengthy set of photo ops of him carrying bottles of water and boxes of sandwiches in well-staged events across Texas, coming to the rescue of the people he was elected to serve, long after President Biden had declared an Emergency at the request of Governor Abbott, and long after rescue and support efforts were well underway by his 2018 opponent, Beto O'Rourke, as well as over $4M of support being raised by Congresswoman AOC, of The Bronx, NY, while he was south of the border. Cruz is a very poor excuse of a public servant.
Finally, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, who has been one of the Democratic darlings of the Covid-19 pandemic, has lost his lustre over allegations concerning both the lack of proper reporting of nursing home deaths during the pandemic and some systemic racism in the vaccine delivery since vaccinations have begun. Both the FBI and the U. S. Attorney's Office are reportedly looking in on Cuomo's actions. People have forgotten that Cuomo, who most assuredly won on his father's name, came under attack in his 2018 Primary from actress and activist Cynthia Nixon as being the "Corporate Candidate." In a 09/10/2018 post on my page, just ahead of the Primary, I mentioned that while I didn't expect Nixon to win, that she was hoping to bring out new voters, voters she had been appealing to from the Left side of the Democratic Party.
Let's hope this week is better for everyone.


© Jeff Noble, Louisville, Kentucky, February 21, 2021.

Sunday, February 14, 2021

826. McConnellian.

Linda Blackford, writing in the Lexington Herald-Leader, uses the word McConnellian, writing

"McConnell's vote to acquit, shortly followed by a fiery speech denouncing Trump is McConnellian hypocrisy, coming right after his next best in saying he couldn't convict Trump after his presidency was over when he delayed the trial until his presidency was over.  That's a lot of contorting."

What a great adjective. Until now, there hasn't been a good word to fully describe the betrayal of Mitch McConnell to Kentucky, the memory of Henry Clay, the U. S. Senate, and the United States. Now we have one.  It occurs to me that "McConnellian" sounds remarkably like "Machiavellian." 


© Jeff Noble, Louisville, Kentucky, February 14, 2021.

Sunday, January 10, 2021

824. Another "Antifa" Terrorist and Traitor to America caught in Nashville

Another one of those "Antifa" people, Eric Gavelek Munchel, 30, was arrested this afternoon and booked into a Nashville jail about two hours ago. This is the "Antifa" guy with the zip-ties, allegedly carried to tie people up so they could later be taken to the gallows that had been erected on the Capitol's South Lawn to be hung.

Those of you who continually try to dismiss this aggression against our Capitol as an expression of First Amendment Free Speech are ignoring what is clear to nearly every public safety agency not just in America, but around the world. Those who were in the Capitol illegally, however they gained entry, had as a goal, the overthrow of the United States Government and the murders of Vice President Pence and Speaker Nancy Pelosi, among others. The woman who was shot, being celebrated as a martyr by the right, was breaking and entering and had been warned by the police to back away from the door. She disregarded a command from an officer of the law and continued her aggression. She is not a martyr. She died as a criminal and should be posthumously charged.

As I said in a post on Wednesday, and as is becoming very clear, the Trump Campaign assuredly, and possibly several Republican members of Congress, and perhaps the Republican National Committee, coordinated the efforts at the overthrow of America. In a separate post, I suggested that cameras in the Capitol, of which I can tell you there are many, coupled with all the videos posted to Facebook and Instagram, will allow most, if not all, of these terrorists to be caught, arrested, and prosecuted by Federal authorities.

There is much talk about the one single "John Sullivan," an Antifa guy on the inside, who "led the insurrection." Those of you Trump supporters who are pinning your hopes on that single person are going to be greatly and gravely disappointed. He, too, will find his actions captured by the myriad cameras in the hallways of Congress. We'll know what his role was. This was not Antifa. This was the traitor Donald Trump and his family and his campaign attempting to overthrow the government.

Eventually, Trump will be charged with sedition, irrespective of whether he is impeached or removed under the 25th Amendment. Between now and the 20th, all Americans, all across the Republic, need to be fully aware of their surroundings. Trump and his supporters are planning another coup for Inauguration Day. This time the newly re-formed Capitol Police, the District of Columbia Police, the National Guards of the District of Columbia, the States of Maryland and New York, and the Commonwealth of Virginia, all will be prepared to mete justice to any attempts at insurrection and sedition.

© Jeff Noble, Louisville, Kentucky, January 10, 2021.

Saturday, January 2, 2021

823. It's going to be a great week in America! Happy 2021.

 

38-3-51
100.305, 321.39, 323.10, 323.12, 323.13
35 Pa. CS 7301 (b).
You might ask, "What are these cites?"
Let me begin by saying starting next week, when the Kentucky General Assembly convenes, the veto-proof Republican-controlled legislature will be taking up 39A.100, which is the equivalent cite in the Kentucky statutes that the above numbers are in the Georgia, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania codes respectively.
They are all cites to state laws approved by their state legislatures granting governors (and in some cases other elected officials) broad (sometimes undefined) extensive authority in times of peril or pandemic. These are the times we are in.
We've been hearing our president (and many of the few supporters he has left) making the argument that the laws under which most of the states conducted their elections, because they were different, amended or altered in their operations by the governors or the officials in charge of elections, somehow nullifies the elections themselves because those laws were not approved by the legislatures themselves.
The stupidity in this argument, and stupid is a word I rarely use but it is most applicable here, is that I am able to cite to Georgia Code 38-3-51; Wisconsin Statutes 100.305, 321.39, 323.10, 323.12, and 323.13; and Chapter 35 of the Pennsylvania Code of Statutes, Section 7301(b), all passed by members elected into the legislatures of the respective states, just as KRS 39A.100 was codified into our Kentucky laws after being passed in last year's General Assembly, all of these granting the authority that the uninformed president and his uninformed supporters say doesn't exist.
Now that the GOP has complete control of the Kentucky General Assembly, and given we have a Democratic governor, they will likely reverse many of the laws they passed in 2020. Republican legislators clearly lack logic.
But lacking even more logic than Republicans in the Kentucky General Assembly is the president and his supporters who make the argument, stupidly, that laws do not exist which allowed the states to conduct last year's elections in the fashion they were conducted.
Fools like Congressman Louie Gohmert, Senator Ted Cruz, and Gov. Ron DeSantis should be tried for sedition, if not treason, against the Republic based on the United States Constitution and cites such as the Georgia Code 38-3-51; Wisconsin Statutes 100.305, 321.39, 323.10, 323.12, and 323.13; and Chapter 35 of the Pennsylvania Code of Statutes, Section 7301(b).

Next week is going to be a great week in America. The Republican Party is going to be seen as the anti-American, anti-Constitution, anti-Rule of Law, anti-Voter, and anti-Election fanatic cult it truly is.

© Jeff Noble, Louisville, Kentucky, January 2, 2021.



Sunday, November 29, 2020

822. The First Sunday of Advent, 2020 - the waiting begins, in church and in America

The liturgical season of Advent, a part of the church calendar in many (but not all) denominations, begins todays.  It is a period of waiting.  Waiting, being watchful, and preparing for the birth of Christ on Christmas Day.

As this Advent season begins, America is in its own period of waiting.  Waiting on this interlude between effective presidencies, the current thus far unwilling to concede a clear loss, the clearly successful challenger moving on, preparing for his oath-taking on January 20. 

As to this American advent, the arrival of "Christmas," in this case Inauguration Day, cannot come soon enough, as the current office holder continues day-after-day to issue useless, meaningless, but in some cases harmful statements, knowing the media (on both sides) as well as his followers and those who oppose him are hanging on his every word.  He thrives on the attention.

I've decided we need to stop responding to his every dictum (which, admittedly, is very hard for me to do).  He is the lamest of lame ducks, having lost the popular vote twice (the only president to ever do so) and will be losing the vote of the Electoral College in two weeks.

In a little over seven weeks (and maybe sooner), he'll be a former president and America will move on from him and all of his criminal sycophants and misguided supporters, saving those serving in the Congress.  

Over the next four years, the best thing that could happen for the Democratic Party, whether the party moves left, center, or right, is for Donald Trump to remain the centerpiece and clear leader of the GOP.  He is not just another arrow in the quiver for the Democrats, but the best and most poisonous they possess.

© Jeff Noble, Louisville, Kentucky, November 29, 2020.


Tuesday, November 17, 2020

820. Smartmatic Machines; Trump's mental instability; Trump's supporters leaning toward treason

Here's the interesting thing about the Smartmatic Voting Machines that allegedly changed votes from Trump to Biden. According to Trump and his gang of lawyers, this only happened in states where Trump lost. These machines are used in 28 states, several where Trump won. Amazingly, the machines worked perfectly there. Only where Trump lost did the machines seem to have problems.

None of those states which Trump won had any problems? Really? None of the states which Biden won big had any problems? Really? All of the problems just happened to occur in the states with close counts. That's an amazing coincidence, almost too amazing to believe. To quote President-elect Biden, "Come on, man."

Here's the bottom line: The president is mentally unstable and may be a danger to himself and certainly to the Republic. Those who support him are accessories to whatever may befall him medically and professionally and are adding to the potential fall of the American Republic, which is akin to treason.

© Jeff Noble, Louisville, Kentucky, November 17, 2020.


Tuesday, October 8, 2019

816. In response to the president refusing to cooperate with the House Impeachment Committees . . . .

Who cares?

The appropriate response to the White House is "Who Cares?" The House doesn't need the White House's permission to proceed, to consider, to investigate, or to vote. Apparently the president has never read the part of the Constitution related to impeachment and its highly likely that Rudy Giuliani hasn't either. Article I, Section II, Clause 5 is very clear on that point. Very clear.

But all this push back makes you wonder. If the call to Ukraine was so "perfect," then what's the problem? If the (12 minute) transcript of the (30 minute) call is all there is then what's the problem? How many of you, being innocent of an accused crime, wouldn't work like hell to get your story out in the news while under oath to clear your name?

Eventually it will all come out, all of his dealings with Putin and the Russian and Ukrainian mob long before he got into politics, long before he decided he needed money to bail out his failed New Jersey casinos, and long before he built not one but two Trump Towers - beautiful towers, no doubt - in Turkey, the leaders of which are no doubt wonderful people with whom to do business, even in times of war.

Thursday, February 14, 2019

815. Mayday, mayday! It's a National Emergency!

Jeff Noble
 
I'm enjoying the glee with which my "conservative" friends are celebrating the president's declaration of a National Emergency to spend billions of dollars that he first promised Mexico would pay for and then couldn't get the Congress, including members of his own party, to buy into. So he's declaring a National Emergency to build his wall, something I told my friend Paul Schmidt I fully expected him to do when he didn't get his way with Mexico or the Congress. This will be the fourth National Emergency he's declared. We're presently living under 28 others besides his three, 12 of Obama's, 13 of W's, and some dating back as far as the Carter presidency. 

Under such an "Emergency," there are some 123 statutory powers the president can use to address the "Emergency." The one distinguishing difference between all 31 of the current "Emergencies" and this new one the president is proposing is none of them spend any money which hasn't already been appropriated by the Congress, something required by the United States Constitution - see Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 of America's Bible on that matter. The president's plan is to expand Executive powers and usurp the fiduciary authority of the Congress by spending money which hasn't been duly appropriated. Hell, we don't even have it.

Under the current "conservative" president, tax revenues are flat, spending is up 9.6%, the deficit has risen 41%, and the National Debt has grown by $2,000,000,000,000.00. That has to be a "conservative" record. So while my "conservative" friends are celebrating this "conservative" victory, the smart thing for the Democrats to do is back off and let him do it.

There will come a day that a National Emergency will arise over climate change or gun violence or our crumbling infrastructure or the opioid crisis, the latter two something the president has promised to address but hasn't, and as long as there is a Democrat in the White House it won't matter if Mitch is still the Majority Leader. We'll have President Trump's precedent of expanding Executive Powers and usurping the fiduciary authority of Congress as established by this current "National Emergency." We should let him do exactly what he wants to do which, to be honest, is one more brick in the wall of destroying both the United States Constitution and the Republic in general.

And the "conservatives" rejoice at this destruction.

Friday, January 4, 2019

814. Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez proposes first conservative fiscal policy in decades to the Congress

By 1981, America had built an interstate system across most of America, we had created a GI bill that allowed a lot of men and later women to go to college and then buy their first homes, and we had sent several men to the Moon and returned them home safely, and we had done all of it while keeping the national debt under One Trillion Dollars, and a Debt-to-GNP at one of its lowest points since the Great Depression. We were the envy of the world and rightly so. When Ronald Reagan described us as the "city shining on the hill," he had every right to do so.
Unfortunately, by that time, he had already set in motion the downfall of America, the fiscal course we're still following. Reagan began, and every one of his successors in office have followed, a series of lowering taxes, Let me point out here that the largest the federal government has ever been ever was under President Reagan. Please, go look it up. A few presidents, including Reagan, also raised taxes. In fact, Reagan raised taxes more than any other president in my lifetime. Please, go look that up too. But overall, Reagan and all of the presidents who have followed him in office have lowered the federal taxes that Americans paid and the end result is we are no longer the "city shining on the hill." We have crumbling bridges and highways. Veterans can hardly get a room at the VA, much less a decent loan to go to college or buy a home. And the debt, which tripled under Reagan, doubled under W, doubled again under Obama, and had added over $2T since Trump took office seems out of reach of ever being paid off. Does that mean we should just say "It'll never be paid off so why worry about it?"
That seems to have been the attitude of almost everyone for a long time although if you know me, I am not among that group of people and never have been. I believe Americans owe it to America to pay off the debt which was created by the governments they voted into office which created it. We are a republican form of government so to say "the debt isn't mine" is to essentially say, "I'm a shirker and screw my creditors." That's what we've been doing as a Republic since Reagan first allowed the national debt to almost triple. One final note on when this all began, back in 1981. At the time, the highest tax bracket for someone "Married Filing Jointly" and making "$215,400.00" was 70% on everything over that amount. 70%. 70% on everything over $215,400.00. In today's dollars, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, that would be $595,007.01. (I can only think of maybe four or five of my readers that this might possibly apply to).
Today's news and a lot of Facebook posts have been filled with that 70% number. Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who represents New York's 14th Congressional District, today proposed a 70% Tax Rate on the nation's wealthiest people to begin addressing the debt and paying for other programs. Imagine that, a member of Congress responsible enough to suggest we find a way to 1) get out of debt and 2) actually pay for what we spend with our own money. (I'll note here that she is a cum laude graduate of Boston University majoring in International Relations and minoring in Economics). But let me repeat my last line - "Imagine that, a member of Congress responsible enough to suggest we find a way to 1) get out of debt and 2) actually pay for what we spend with our own money." You would think that such a policy would have conservatives jumping for joy. Finally a level-headed fiscal policy coming out of the mouth of a Washington politician. Spending our own money instead of borrowing it from China. What a novel idea.
Instead, conservative, Republicans, old white men, and, frankly, a lot of Democrats are up in arms at "such a crazy idea." They're calling her a socialist. She claims to be a Democratic-Socialist which is something altogether different but most of these people don't care about the difference and are too educationally lazy to find out what it is. We finally have someone in Congress who wants to address the economic woes of the Republic, woes wholly created before she arrived (which was yesterday), and the world goes mad.
Here's a thought. She's 29. She'll be 30 in October of this year. Her generation and the one following will have to live and pay the debt created by the three generations of American politicians who preceded her. And who is yelling foul the most? Those same people. Those same exact people. Either they are for fiscal management or they aren't. Since we are $21,000,000,000,000.00 in debt under their watch, it is clear where they stand.
Good work, Congresswoman. Finally a voice of reason.

Monday, July 16, 2018

811. Betrayal.



July 16, 2018 will be recorded in the history books of future decades as the day an American president betrayed the 61,000,000 people who voted for him and the 74,000,000 who didn't, and every other American, by telling the president of Russia that he favors and believes him, a tyrant and dictator, over our own American intelligence and military agencies. It's an incredible day; the day the music died.

Friday, February 9, 2018

807. If you think the GOP is conservative, you're not paying attention.

U. S. Senator Rand Paul has shut down the government, not over DACA, but over deficits.

He said, "If you were against President Obama's deficits, and now you're for the Republican deficits, isn't that the very definition of hypocrisy?" This is the same guy who just voted in December to give the rich and the corporate a huge tax break adding immediately to the deficit and long term to the debt. He represents the very meaning of hypocrisy as does the entire GOP crowd these days.

They claim the mantle of evangelicals yet support a president who paid off a whore shortly after the birth of his fifth child by his third wife. And they claim to be conservatives and libertarians yet the tax cut they passed in 2017 mostly helps the rich and the corporate and will add debts for future generations in the same manner that the wars and destruction of the American economy including the automobile and banking industries of George Bush, Jr. were paid for by the excessive borrowing of Barack Obama.

If you remain a conservative, and it is fine if you do, you need to go and form a new party because the Republicans in Washington are in no way conservative. They are big government spenders, big government borrowers, and huge, huge hypocrites. All of you know I am a big government tax-and-spend liberal in the form and image of LBJ and Richard Nixon.I am not a centrist such as Bill or Hillary Clinton or what Barack Obama proved to be, nor am I a borrow-and-spend Republican in the form and image of Ronald Reagan, both George Bush's, and Donald Trump.

Sunday, July 9, 2017

801. The G20's Biggest Loser?

The G20 Summit is over. The biggest loser? America.

The speech in Poland, where supporters were bussed in to applaud our president's every word, was the highlight of his visit. As for the G20 Summit itself, the president has left the United States a weaker nation on the international front. We are now where we were prior to President McKinley's expansion of the American Empire. That began in 1896.

America First is only true in one nation. The president's followers, his sheep, may like that, may think this is good putting those smaller players in their places. But we cannot exist in isolation. The president has moved us backwards 121 years. We are the laughingstock of the world and no longer a world power.

Japan and the European Union brokered a deal while the president had Ivanka take his place at the trade table. I'm trying to imagine the outcry if Obama had sat Malia down there or if Clinton had put Chelsea in the same chair. Chancellor Merkel, Prime Minister Trudeau, and President Macron are now the leaders of the free world. We are a colonial nation, provincial in power, and no longer a player.

When the great powers of the world start placing tariffs on incoming goods and Americans start paying the price for the president's cowardice, what his sheep call bravado, on the international front, and our pocketbooks see our dollars go to support empires in other countries, he will no longer be president. He will be back home in Trump Tower and will have no worries about the 325M people he has left behind and his sheep, his followers, will wonder "What happened? Where is our shepherd to save us?"

Thursday, January 19, 2017

799. Thank you, President Obama. Good Luck, Mr. Trump.

Eight years ago tomorrow on a very cold morning I stood in line with Jessie Phelps, Brandon Jewell, Chris Hartman, Christa Robinson, and over one million of our close friends as we waited for the new president to take the Oath of Office. I had voted for Barack Obama in both the Primary and the General of the previous year. I had met him at Slugger Field in 2006 when he made a campaign appearance for then-candidate John Yarmuth who was running his first (and successful) race for Congress, of which I had a part as an adviser, a role I still have in the Yarmuth for Congress campaign apparatus.
I was as excited as I have ever been at the onset of a new presidential administration. I was hopeful for all those people, those million-plus who spilled out into the National Mall on that cold morning, and for those people with whom I had waited in line to vote at the L-113 polling place on S. Shelby Street two months earlier, and especially hopeful for the minorities in the crowd and the young folks who had pushed Barack Obama’s popular vote to over 51%, the first of Obama’s two 51+% elections, the only president to have such a margin twice since Dwight Eisenhower. We were all very hopeful, very excited. It was a good time to be a liberal Christian Democrat, labels I still hold dear, labels I know President Obama also holds dear.
Looking ahead to his departure I wanted to reflect on the eight years which have had mixed results on many fronts. No one can doubt that many people have prospered. The Dow Jones Industrial Average has improved over 150% during his administration, outperforming all but three other presidencies, those of Clinton, FDR, and Coolidge. The job force has seen an increase for 75 straight months. Under President Obama, estimates are that about 15,000,000 new jobs have been created, making him the third best president in this regard in modern history, behind Clinton in first and Reagan in second. More than a few of those jobs came about building and rebuilding parts of America’s infrastructure as part of the “Stimulus Plan” known officially as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. You can see real literal concrete improvements in most any community in the Republic, whether rural, suburban, or urban. However, it must also be acknowledged that many of the jobs created since 2009 have lacked the buying power of the jobs they replaced. Automation and cheap labor overseas have taken a toll on American labor. Kentucky has seen its share of jobs gained in the automotive and related industries while we have also suffered with losses in the coal mines. Obama, and specifically the EPA, gets blamed for the coal losses but that’s simply a GOP selling point. Twice as many coal jobs were lost under Reagan as were lost under Obama. We’ve lost coal jobs under every president, Democrat or Republican, during the last 30 years with the single exception of George W. Bush’s terms of office. It should be said that even in Kentucky the job indices are looking good. The last jobs report dated November 2016 indicated unemployment was below 10% in every Kentucky county save one, Magoffin, for the first time since 2007.
The bright light shining on the Obama administration has been the Affordable Care Act, signed into law on March 23, 2010. Before any discussion of Obamacare, I would ask how many people were complaining about their healthcare costs before Obamacare? Most people would have to admit they were. To be sure, there are problems with Obamacare. The Congress has had almost seven years to resolve those problems but has chosen not to. Could it be that they weighed the good with the bad and determined the good outweighed the bad? I don’t know. For all the talk from everybody on the GOP side to repeal Obamacare on Day One “root and branch” that hasn’t happened and we are quickly getting to Month Two. Obamacare has its detractors, a small few of whom have legitimate complaints about it but many of whom dislike like it mostly because it is Obama’s plan. Personally I’ve always considered it the first step to a more socialized system of healthcare delivery, true healthcare, as opposed to an insurance system, but few people either in favor or opposed seem to understand that distinction. Like so many things, people are either for or against based on the idea that it belongs to Obama. As of tomorrow, it will belong to the new president.
There are other issues where Obama has, in my opinion, done the right thing. Approving federal dollars for stem-cell research might be at the top of that list. The long-term ramifications of this research are unknown but it may be helpful for many generations to come and anytime you can “pay it forward” on such a large scale should be considered a good thing, an honorable thing. Science played a large role in the Obama administration. His Science Fairs for middle-school students were, in a word, cool. I am hopeful that science finds as great or a greater role in the upcoming administration.
I have liked the steady calm delivery of the president. I have liked his passion and emotion. I have liked what I think is his honesty. I have liked his level-headedness and his willingness to speak to Americans across all social and economic boundaries. In listening to him I am convinced that while he is far more intelligent than most of us, he has taken great efforts at communicating with as many people as possible in a way they understand. He is an honest successor to President Reagan as a great communicator.
An honest assessment of the president must include those areas where I find fault with him. Those are mostly on the foreign policy front. Admittedly, I am not all that smart when it comes to foreign policy. A lot of foreign policy in my mind is intertwined with military policy where I believe in a small but strong military but also believe in as little war as possible. The Obama for whom I voted in 2008 seemed to be more aligned with my views on this front than the Obama who served eight years as Commander-In-Chief. Yes, Osama Bin Laden is gone but so are lots of innocent civilians. Yes, we are out of Iraq but we are deeper than ever in Afghanistan. I do not wholly approve of drone warfare although maybe I need to know more about it. I do not completely understand Syria, the Arab Spring, and our responses to that but I do not approve of what we have done or are doing. We misread the events involving Russia and Ukraine and I’m not sure we know where we stand with either country.
And that brings us to Russia.
Russia, the remnant country of the former USSR.
All my life we have been taught that Russia is the enemy. We waited to see who would blink. We crawled under our desks in grade school imperiled by the Cold War. We implored Mr. Gorbachev to “tear down this wall.” We have been at odds with Russia for decades. Now suddenly we aren’t. Suddenly we’re okay with Russia. I don’t get that. I don’t get that military people I know suddenly have a newfound love for Russia. No one can quite explain it or maybe they just don’t want to.
In the very early morning hours of November 9th, a few short minutes after Hillary Clinton conceded the previous night’s election, I posted a congratulatory note on my Facebook page to President-Elect Trump. I had just gotten off the phone with my longtime friend Preston Bates who, while not supporting Mr. Trump, had precisely nailed the Electoral College down to the First Congressional District of Maine and its separate balloting from the rest of the state a few days earlier. While it is disconcerting to me that in a race where 74,074,037 voted against someone for whom 62,979,879 voted that the lesser-voted candidate won, that is our system. We are a federal Republic of states and our states vote for president, not our residents. I’ve never complained about the Electoral College to my recollection; this isn’t the time to start.
I am hopeful that the new president builds on the job gains made under President Obama. I am hopeful that the new president sees a 150% increase in the Dow Jones Average just as President Obama has. I am hopeful that the new president continues the $831 Billion commitment on infrastructure found in the Stimulus Plan of 2009. I am hopeful that the president continues to work with our science and technology community to find new treatments and medical procedures for those in need. I am hopeful for lot of things. And while I do not share the new president’s agenda in many regards, I do not want him to fail as I do not believe we have the resources to recover.
To “make America great again” is a noble goal. I believe we are a great nation but that there was a time when we were even greater. And in those days there was one major difference, something which has been taken from us and this is the resolve and the idea that the government can and should be a vehicle for the collective improvement of we, the people. To “make America great again” will require a lot of coming together as opposed to tearing apart. And it will require money. Lots of money, first to get out of debt and then a lot more to do the programs the new president wishes to implement.
America is in debt. We first went “deep in debt” under President Reagan when he borrowed-and-spent the Republic down so much as to tripling the National Debt while he was in office. Even Obama hasn’t done that. And beginning with Reagan, who enjoyed a federal tax rate on the wealthiest earners of 50% for most of his presidency, we’ve been lowering that rate and exempting more and more people from taxes. If we go back to the “great times” of Nixon, Ford, or Johnson, that rate is 70%. Lots of people look to Eisenhower as president during America’s golden era. The rate then was 91%. To make America great again will mean paying for it. We are getting the government we are willing to pay for. Simply changing presidents will not make America great again; changing our attitude toward the government will.
So, farewell and thank you, President Obama. Thank you so much. You brought us hope and it mostly worked. And thank you too to Mrs. Obama and Sasha and Malia for their class and graciousness. Finally, Good Luck, Mr. Trump. You’ve made a lot of promises. You will need a lot of luck and hard work to deliver on those promises. That starts tomorrow – or, as you have indicated, Monday.

Sunday, January 8, 2017

798. Trump's one solid rock - Putin.

Next weekend President-Elect Trump becomes President Trump. It will be interesting to see what else he flip-flops on between now and then. Since the campaign there have been a number of things. He's flipped on prosecuting Hillary. "Lock her up" was just for show. He's flipped on Obama going from "he's the most ignorant president in history" to "I have great respect and will seek his counsel." He's flipped on gay marriage changing his mind as to appointing justices who might flip the current law. He's flipped on illegal immigrants from throwing out all 11 million to working on the 3 to 4 million who are proven criminals, something I agree with him on. He flipped on his feelings for the Electoral College calling it "a disaster" before the election and, well, afterwards understandably calling it "genius." He flipped on settling the Trump University case, saying in March "I won't settle" but settling nonetheless for $25M in September. He's even flipped on Obamacare, going from "It has to go on Day One" to agreeing with Sen. Rand Paul that it should not be repealed until there is something to replace it with. Incidentally, Day One was last week. And the big one, the Wall. Mexico was going to pay for the Wall - not just a fence, but a Wall, a big Wall. Now Americans are going to pay for it at a cost of about $10.7M a mile and we're going to beg Mexico to reimburse us. Oh brother. But there is one thing the President-Elect has never wavered on - his undying support and alliance with Vladimir Putin and the Russian state. He continues to defend Russia even against our our intelligence and military officials. As Andy Rooney would say, "Why is that?"

Tuesday, January 6, 2015

789. Gowdy, briefly, a coward.

I think the best part of the 114th Congress so far was watching Trey Gowdy's star fall so fast once he announced that he would have voted for Boehner for Speaker, something his Tea Party/Benghazi zealots simply cannot abide. Of course the BMOC Gowdy didn't even show up for the vote claiming the weather precluded his arrival in Washington DC. Excuses, excuses.

Sunday, December 21, 2014

786. A brief thought on Obama

One of the things the Right doesn't understand is that the Left, of which I am a part, is nearly as upset with the president as they are. We feel he has compromised on almost every major issue. We feel he has coddled up with K Street lawyers and lobbyists and Wall Street bankers and con-men. We feel that he is far too centrist, just like most of the men (so far) which we have nominated going all the way back to at least Adlai Stevenson in 1952. But we are also confident that a bad centrist better is for the people of America than the men (so far) who have been offered as standard bearers of the GOP since Reagan. The Right has systematically lowered taxes over the last 35 years, making government less and less responsive to ourselves and our global neighbors. The lessening of civility is a direct result of Americans being less involved with their government than ever, both in the taxes they pay and in the rate they vote. There is a reason for this. Beginning with Reagan, we've been taught that government (which is America) is the problem and that rugged individualism is the solution. In that same time period of lessening taxes, the rich of our nation have gotten exponentially richer while the middle class and the poor have done the opposite. America is not the great country it once was. We lead in murders, we lack in education, and we argue over the pettiest of issues. Why? Because we have forgotten that we, America, are the "We the people" famously found in the Constitution. It isn't you and me and that one over there, but all of us collectively. I do not know if Reagan and his followers - Norquist, Gingrich, Phil Gramm, Romney, and others - have destroyed the Republic beyond repair. I personally believe they have although there are others in my party and on my side of the aisle who differ with me. Unfortunately I do not see too many people in either party doing much about it. I'll add, to close, two points. The scrolling at the end of the video is something that we each agree on. Finally, the last good liberal in the White House was Richard Nixon.

Saturday, November 8, 2014

785. As to my predictions - the promised report.


Last week, prior to the Election, I made a bold set of predictions for the Alison Grimes - Mitch McConnell race for the United States Senate.  At Entry #784, posted at 9:07 the night before the election, I predicted Mitch McConnell would receive 4,400 votes fewer than Alison.  Although the number does not appear in the post, my notes indicate that my prediction was for McConnell to poll 788129 votes to Alison's 792529. Despite my wishful thinking we all know that 4,400 margin of victory didn't happen and it didn't happen in a big way.  

In my defense (and this entire entry is "in my defense") McConnell's numbers were, relatively speaking" close to my prediction.  He outperformed my expectations by 2.36%.  That's pretty close.  I like it that I predicted the number I did for McConnell.  What does it tell us?  Mostly that his voters were very traditional, very reliable, and rather unmovable.  I have often described my style of "doing numbers" with the phrase "birds of a feather vote together." In Mitch's case, that is exactly what happened.  He did not receive an outpouring of new voters, people upset with Obama or Alison or Steve Beshear or anyone else.  He got 2.36% better than he should have gotten by my numbers.  That's no big deal.

Here's the big deal.  My prediction for Alison was 792,529 votes.  She polled 584,698, a deficit of 207,831, or only 73.77% of my predicted number for her.  Again we must ask, as everyone has been asking, why? Most people are blaming her loss on the president and his intense unpopularity in the Commonwealth. That can't be denied.  But there is more to it than that.

I'll be the first to admit (now that it is over) my predictions for her, unlike those for McConnell, were loaded in her favor.  I really wanted her to win.  She is a friends and her parents are dear friends who have been supportive of me in many ways.  My predictions numbers included some "seeded clouds" intended to make supporters recognize that a GOTV effort on Election Day was paramount in obtaining a victory, and pointing out as I did in the original post the importance and difficulty of getting those voters out especially in the two most populous counties, Fayette and Jefferson.  She didn't in either and the national networks called the race as soon as they could as that last poll closed in the Central Time Zone.  Alison had to do in Fayette and Jefferson what had never been done before and didn't.  My predictions in those two counties were, quite honestly, extraordinarily wishful thinking.  More than a few people through the night seemed to know that.

Sticking to traditional conservative values did not help where it might have - in the east and the west. Sticking to those same values or avoiding others, especially with regard to the president didn't help in Louisville and Lexington.  Would it have made a difference or do most people who always vote Republican continue to do so and do most people who always vote Democratic continue to do so?  Again, birds of a feather.  

In summary, Alison failed to move more than a few Republican-voting Democrats over to her column.  She also failed, in a large way, to give Fayette and Jefferson's non-traditional voters - those who only vote in presidential years - a reason to come out in her favor.  That was a needle we had to move and didn't. Doing those two things might have made the difference.  

But, back to those abysmal predictions of mine.  Other than my McConnell number which was marginally correct, my best predictions came in adjoining counties, Simpson where I missed the mark by 51 votes, and Warren where it was 89.  Grayson was the next closest at 95. Others close enough to brag about were Cumberland and Marion - each at 101, Nelson at 120, McCreary at 133, Robertson at 145 - and honestly I shouldn't include Robertson as it is hard to be off by 145 as opposed to easy, Monroe at 149, and Butler at 188.

Arguably my best prediction came from Fayette given its size where I was off 659 votes.  My worst, of course, was Jefferson at 33025.  I suppose that should be embarrassing.  The entire list is below.

Takeaway? Simple - running on traditional Republican values didn't move anyone and may have alienated some.  Let's see how those considering a 2015 statewide run respond to that. 


Below are my original predictions with the actuals to the right of those and occasional notes.

ADAIR - (2100) - (777)
ALLEN - (2100) - (435)
ANDERSON - (600) - (1406)
BALLARD - (100) - (926)
BARREN - (2100) - (1077)
BATH - 700 - (587)
BELL - (1400) - (2151)
BOONE (17000) - 3588 - Boone's deficit was 3588 lower than my prediction.
BOURBON - 200 (387)
BOYD - 200 - (233)
BOYLE - (1100) - (445)
BRACKEN - 100 - (577)
BREATHITT - even - (368)
BRECKINRIDGE - (300) - (990)
BULLITT - (4000) - (1870)
BUTLER - (1600) - (188)
CALDWELL - even - (1346)
CALLOWAY - (1800) - (787)
CAMPBELL - (6100) - (536)
CARLISLE - even - (609)
CARROLL - 400 - (366) - Carroll's win was 366 lower than my prediction.
CARTER - 900 - (169) - Carter's win was 169 lower than my prediction.
CASEY - (2100) - (425)
CHRISTIAN - (2500) - (1301)
CLARK - (1400) - (849)
CLAY - (2500) - (772)
CLINTON - (1900) - (418)
CRITTENDEN - (600) - (730)
CUMBERLAND - (1200) - (101)
DAVIESS - (1600) - (3195)
EDMONSON - (800) - (561)
ELLIOTT - 500 - (245) - Elliott's win was 245 lower than my prediction.
ESTILL (600) - (693)
FAYETTE - 5600 - Note - 4322 more votes than Conway got over Paul, not an easy task. - (659)
FLEMING - 400 - (1343)
FLOYD - 2300 - (3480)
FRANKLIN - 4000 - (1795) - Franklin's win was 1795 lower than my prediction.
FULTON - even - (283)
GALLATIN - (100) - (402)
GARRARD - (1700) - (502)
GRANT - (1700) - (488)
GRAVES - (1500) - (2506)
GRAYSON - (2400) - (95)
GREEN - (1000) - (744)
GREENUP - 100 - (799)
HANCOCK - 500 - (675)
HARDIN - (3800) - (1776)
HARLAN - (1300) - (2952)
HARRISON - (300) - (685)
HART - (500) - (548)
HENDERSON - 500 - (1140)
HENRY - (200) - (699)
HICKMAN - even - (449)
HOPKINS - (2700) - (2618)
JACKSON - (1200) - (1499)
JEFFERSON - 69000 - Note - 40050 more votes than Conway got over Paul, not an easy task. - A note here - Alison beat McConnell by 35975 votes.  I had hoped/prayed/predicted against all logic that she would win by 69000, a difference of 33025.  I noted in the prediction that she needed a 40050 vote bigger win than Jack got over Randy.  Jack got fewer votes than Alison as Rand got fewer than Mitch.  Jack's margin was 28950.  Alison got 7025 more votes than Jack.  I really need to break Jefferson down by legislative district.  (33025) - Jefferson's win was 33025 fewer than my prediction.
JESSAMINE - (3300) - (1955)
JOHNSON - (2300) - (1156)
KENTON - (13500) - 1864 - Kenton's deficit was 1864 fewer than my prediction.
KNOTT - 500 - (1417)
KNOX - (2500) - (1526)
LARUE - (800) - (558)
LAUREL - (7100) - (1516)
LAWRENCE - even - (1286)
LEE - (400) - (530)
LESLIE - (2500) - (329)
LETCHER - (300) - (1992)
LEWIS - (1600) - 168.  Lewis's deficit was 168 less than my prediction.
LINCOLN - (600) - (1375)
LIVINGSTON - (200) - (785)
LOGAN - (1800) - (213)
LYON - even - (671)
MADISON - (2500) - (2565)
MAGOFFIN - 700 - (1839)
MARION - 900 - 101 - Marion's win was 101 fewer than my prediction.
MARSHALL - (1100) - (1809)
MARTIN - (1200) - (952)
MASON - 300 - (1387)
MCCRACKEN - (4400) - (2381)
MCCREARY - (2100) - (133)
MCLEAN - even - (760)
MEADE - (400) - (930)
MENIFEE - 900 - (792) - Menifee's win was 792 fewer than my prediction.
MONROE - (2600) - 149. Monroe's deficit was 149 fewer than my prediction.
MORGAN - 700 - (1113)
MUHLENBERG - 1000 - (1943)
NELSON - (900) - (120) - Nelson's defeat was 120 fewer than my prediction.
NICHOLAS - 400 - (258) - Nicholas's win was 258 fewer than my prediction.
OHIO - (200) - (2024)
OLDHAM - (7600) - (297) - Oldham's defeat was 297 fewer than my prediction.
OWEN - (300) - (812)
OWSLEY - (500) - (384)
PENDLETON - (800) - (611)
PERRY - (700) - (2381)
PIKE - 200 - (5509)
POWELL - 600 - (734) 
PULASKI - (8400) - (1947)
ROBERTSON - even - (145)
ROCKCKASTLE - (1600) - (1081)
ROWAN - 1200 - (986) - Rowan's win was 986 fewer than my prediction.
RUSSELL - (2600) - (494)
SCOTT - (1700) - (934)
SHELBY - (2700) - (995)
SIMPSON - (800) - (51)
SPENCER - (1500) - (821)
TAYLOR - (1000) - (1848)
TODD - (700) - (488)
TRIGG - (1000) - (563)
TRIMBLE - even - (396)
UNION -200 - (1547)
WARREN - (6700) - (89)
WASHINGTON - (400) - (480)
WAYNE - (1000) - (889)
WEBSTER - even - (1342)
WHITLEY - (3700) - (694)
WOLFE - 600 - (554) - Wolfe's win by 554 fewer than my prediction.
WOODFORD - (100) - (1003)

Monday, November 3, 2014

784. Marginally speaking, let's do the numbers.

Let me say at the outset that I expect Alison Grimes to narrowly defeat Mitch McConnell in tomorrow's election for the United States Senate.  It would be an upset of massive proportions defeating the Minority Leader who may by the end of this year's balloting be the Majority Leader.

The win will come as a matter of holding our own in the north, south, and east; running up some numbers in the center; and doing marginally better while still losing west of I-65.  I watched the ground game come together in the last few weeks and it is impressive.  Whoever is in charge, and there has been some question as to who it is, they've done a marvelous job.

I've had no role other than as a supporter and tomorrow as a voter.  For the moment, assuming the win I am assuming, I will give the credit to Jonathan Hurst, Dale Emmons, Jerry Lundergan, and most importantly the candidate, Alison Grimes.

A note to Mr. David Patterson of Harrodsburg, the Libertarian candidate in this race - as a Third-Party or Independent candidate, the bar is set much higher for him or anyone to have their name placed on the ballot.  Many in my party would disagree with me but I think the playing field - effectively ballot access - should be the same for everyone.  While Secretary Grimes and Senator McConnell's filing papers required two signatures, Mr. Patterson's required 5000.  One of those verified 5000 signatures was mine.  

Here we go - a county-by-county - Alison winners in BOLD -  listing of the margin of victory or (loss) which will yield a razor-thin win of 4,400 votes for Alison Grimes. These are not vote totals but rather the difference between the two candidates, irrespective of the vote received by the Libertarian candidate, Mr. Patterson.  And importantly note for this to happen, it will require an additional margin of 44372 votes from Fayette and Jefferson together.

Do your part.

ADAIR - (2100)
ALLEN - (2100)
ANDERSON - (600)
BALLARD - (100)
BARREN - (2100)
BATH - 700
BELL - (1400)
BOONE (17000)
BOURBON - 200
BOYD - 200
BOYLE - (1100)
BRACKEN - 100
BREATHITT - even
BRECKINRIDGE - (300)
BULLITT - (4000)
BUTLER - (1600)
CALDWELL - even
CALLOWAY - (1800)
CAMPBELL - (6100)
CARLISLE - even
CARROLL - 400
CARTER - 900
CASEY - (2100)
CHRISTIAN - (2500)
CLARK - (1400)
CLAY - (2500)
CLINTON - (1900)
CRITTENDEN - (600)
CUMBERLAND - (1200)
DAVIESS - (1600)
EDMONSON - (800)
ELLIOTT - 500
ESTILL (600)
FAYETTE - 5600 - Note - 4322 more votes than Conway got over Paul, not an easy task.
FLEMING - 400
FLOYD - 2300
FRANKLIN - 4000
FULTON - even
GALLATIN - (100)
GARRARD - (1700)
GRANT - (1700)
GRAVES - (1500)
GRAYSON - (2400)
GREEN - (1000)
GREENUP - 100
HANCOCK - 500
HARDIN - (3800)
HARLAN - (1300)
HARRISON - (300)
HART - (500)
HENDERSON - 500
HENRY - (200)
HICKMAN - even
HOPKINS - (2700)
JACKSON - (1200)
JEFFERSON - 69000 - Note - 40050 more votes than Conway got over Paul, not an easy task.
JESSAMINE - (3300)
JOHNSON - (2300)
KENTON - (13500)
KNOTT - 500
KNOX - (2500)
LARUE - (800)
LAUREL - (7100)
LAWRENCE - even
LEE - (400)
LESLIE - (2500)
LETCHER - (300)
LEWIS - (1600)
LINCOLN - (600)
LIVINGSTON - (200)
LOGAN - (1800)
LYON - even
MADISON - (2500)
MAGOFFIN - 700
MARION - 900
MARSHALL - (1100)
MARTIN - (1200)
MASON - 300
MCCRACKEN - (4400)
MCCREARY - (2100)
MCLEAN - even
MEADE - (400)
MENIFEE - 900
MONROE - (2600)
MORGAN - 700
MUHLENBERG - 1000
NELSON - (900)
NICHOLAS - 400
OHIO - (200)
OLDHAM - (7600)
OWEN - (300)
OWSLEY - (500)
PENDLETON - (800)
PERRY - (700)
PIKE - 200
POWELL - 600 
PULASKI - (8400)
ROBERTSON - even
ROCKCKASTLE - (1600)
ROWAN - 1200
RUSSELL - (2600)
SCOTT - (1700)
SHELBY - (2700)
SIMPSON - (800)
SPENCER - (1500)
TAYLOR - (1000)
TODD - (700)
TRIGG - (1000)
TRIMBLE - even
UNION -200
WARREN - (6700)
WASHINGTON - (400)
WAYNE - (1000)
WEBSTER - even
WHITLEY - (3700)
WOLFE - 600
WOODFORD - (100)

The Archives at Milepost 606

Personal

Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Never married, liberal Democrat, born in 1960, opinionated but generally pleasant, member of the Episcopal Church. Graduate of Prestonia Elementary, Durrett High, and Spalding University; the first two now-closed Jefferson County Public Schools, the latter a very small liberal arts college in downtown Louisville affiliated with the Roman Catholic Sisters of Charity of Nazareth. My vocation and avocation is politics. My favorite pastime is driving the backroads of Kentucky and southern Indiana, visiting small towns, political hangouts, courthouses, churches, and cemeteries. You are welcome to ride with me sometime.